Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Configure IDE probe delays | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Sat, 31 Jul 2004 20:35:25 +0100 |
| |
On Sad, 2004-07-31 at 19:06, Lee Revell wrote: > Maybe we need a CONFIG_ANCIENT_HARDWARE that people can set if they want > to use old stuff, and anywhere in the code we take a big hit to make > some ancient device work wouldn't get compiled. Devices could be added > to this class as they are identified.
Wrong way around. You want a CONFIG_BOY_RACER option for people with overclocked computers and delay loops "optimised" away.
If you want to speed this up then the two bits that the initial proposal and Jeff have sensibly come up with are
1. Are we doing too many probes 2. Should we switch to proper reset polling
For certain cases (PPC spin up) we actually have switched to doing drive spin up this way, I certainly have no objection to doing the rest of the boot optimisation by following the standards carefully.
BTW: We should also turn on the PPC specific spin up stuff generically nowdays with suspend/resume and stuff like LinuxBIOS.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |