Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sat, 31 Jul 2004 19:29:11 +0200 | | From | Marc Ballarin <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Delete cryptoloop |
| |
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:05:34 -0500 Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> wrote:
> > Ideally, we'd ship a requirements and specification document that > describes the security trade-offs of cryptoloop/dm-crypt in some > detail. There are way too many unstated assumptions here. >
Indeed. I have just tried to start a discussion of the future design goals on the dm-crypt mailinglist.
If you are not subscribed see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.device-mapper.dm-crypt/379
Regards - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |