Messages in this thread |  | | | Subject | Re: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY | | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | | Date | Sat, 31 Jul 2004 10:10:06 +0200 |
| |
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 00:37, David S. Miller wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:02:33 -0700 > "Robert White" <rwhite@casabyte.com> wrote: > > > 4) Cork-then-uncork would still end up with two syscalls instead of one. > > Syscalls are incredible cheap, this is not an argument for not > using cork'ing.
btw do we export MSG_MORE functionality to userspace ? That might be a solution as well... [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |