lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: tcp_push_pending_frames() without TCP_CORK or TCP_NODELAY
From
Date
On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 00:37, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:02:33 -0700
> "Robert White" <rwhite@casabyte.com> wrote:
>
> > 4) Cork-then-uncork would still end up with two syscalls instead of one.
>
> Syscalls are incredible cheap, this is not an argument for not
> using cork'ing.

btw do we export MSG_MORE functionality to userspace ? That might be a
solution as well...
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans