Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jul 2004 20:51:27 -0400 (EDT) | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [patch] mlock-as-nonroot revisted |
| |
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I seem to recall that Andrea identified reasons why per-user mlock > limits were fundamentally broken/unsuitable, but I forget the details. > Perhaps he could remind us?
Fixed in the current patch.
> As for this patch: it's a new capability which will get basically zero > testing for the next year, which is a worry. How have you tested it, and > how much?
It's been in RHEL3 for a while now. First with the the mistake Andrea identified, but that code's been fixed too now...
-- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |