Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jul 2004 23:11:37 +0200 | From | Adrian Bunk <> | Subject | Re: [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS=n |
| |
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:46:52PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > Mark this combination as BROKEN until XFS is fixed. > > > > > > This part is not useful. We want to hear about problems > > > that people hit with 4K stacks so we can try to address > > > them, and it mostly works as is. > > > > 2.6 is a stable kernel series used in production environments. > > > > Regarding Linus' tree, it's IMHO the best solution to work around it > > this way until all issues are sorted out. > > > > Feel free to revert it in -mm later, since there are many brave souls > > running -mm you'll still get to hear about problems. > > can you then also mark XFS broken in 2.4 entirely? > 2.4 has a nett stack of also 4Kb...
There are reports of breakages with 4kb stacks in 2.6, but AFAIK no similar reports for 2.4 .
cu Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |