lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS=n
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:46:52PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> > > > Mark this combination as BROKEN until XFS is fixed.
> > >
> > > This part is not useful. We want to hear about problems
> > > that people hit with 4K stacks so we can try to address
> > > them, and it mostly works as is.
> >
> > 2.6 is a stable kernel series used in production environments.
> >
> > Regarding Linus' tree, it's IMHO the best solution to work around it
> > this way until all issues are sorted out.
> >
> > Feel free to revert it in -mm later, since there are many brave souls
> > running -mm you'll still get to hear about problems.
>
> can you then also mark XFS broken in 2.4 entirely?
> 2.4 has a nett stack of also 4Kb...

There are reports of breakages with 4kb stacks in 2.6, but AFAIK no
similar reports for 2.4 .

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:1.334 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site