lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.8-rc2-L2, preemptable hardirqs
    From
    Date
    On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 01:05, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > * Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
    > if your soundcard doesnt share the irq line with any other 'heavy'
    > interrupt then you can make the irq 'direct' via a simple change to
    > arch/i386/kernel/irq.c, change this line from:
    >
    > #define redirectable_irq(irq) ((irq) != 0)
    >
    > to:
    >
    > #define redirectable_irq(irq) (((irq) != 0) && ((irq) != 10))
    >
    > (if the soundcard is on IRQ 10).
    >
    > does such a change combined with v=3 fix the latencies you are seeing?

    With L2, 1:3, max_sectors_kb=256, and the above change, the performance
    is truly amazing. Over 20 million interrupts, on a 600Mhz machine, the
    worst latency I was able to trigger was 46 usecs. There does not seem
    to be any adverse affect on any aspect of the system.

    This looks like the perfect setup for a DAW.

    Lee

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.022 / U:29.612 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site