[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH][2.6] Allow x86_64 to reenable interrupts on contention
    On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Andi Kleen wrote:

    > On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 05:29:10 -0400 (EDT)
    > Zwane Mwaikambo <> wrote:
    > > This is a follow up to the previous patches for ia64 and i386, it will
    > > allow x86_64 to reenable interrupts during contested locks depending on
    > > previous interrupt enable status. It has been runtime and compile tested
    > > on UP and 2x SMP Linux-tiny/x86_64.
    > This will likely increase code size. Do you have numbers by how much? And is it
    > really worth it?

    Yes there is a growth;

    text data bss dec hex filename
    3655358 1340511 486128 5481997 53a60d vmlinux-after
    3648445 1340511 486128 5475084 538b0c vmlinux-before

    And this was on i386;

    text data bss dec hex filename
    2628024 921731 0 3549755 362a3b vmlinux-after
    2621369 921731 0 3543100 36103c vmlinux-before

    Keith Owens managed to get increased throughput as the original patch was
    driven by poor performance from a workload. I think it's worth it just for
    the reduced interrupt latency, the code size issue can also be taken care
    of, but that requires benchmarking as the change is a bit more drastic.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.021 / U:50.960 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site