Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 26 Jul 2004 16:35:33 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] prio_tree iterator cleanup. |
| |
Rajesh Venkatasubramanian <vrajesh@umich.edu> wrote: > > I have gone through all the 3 prio_tree patches you have sent > over the last few weeks. Your 2nd (kill vma_prio_tree_init) and > 3rd (iterator cleanup) patches look straight-forward. > > I agree that vm_set.head linking is ugly. Your 1st patch > attempts to simplify it and removes few lines of code. However, > your 1st patch is intrusive and I am not convinced that it > improves the code very much. > > If you can post your 2nd and 3rd patches independent of your > first patch, that will be great. Please covert vma_prio_tree_next > in arch/* directories if you plan to post a new version of your > 3rd patch. > > Overall I am inclined to leave the prio_tree code as it is. > However, your 2nd and 3rd patches are quiet straight-forward > and I am okay with them.
Thanks, Rajesh.
Oleg, I didn't apply any patches in this area. Please reissue any prio-tree patches from scratch. Thanks.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |