lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: New dev model (was [PATCH] delete devfs)
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 02:55:39AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Changes that remove functionally like Greg's patch are hopefully
> > > still 2.7 stuff - 2.6 is a stable kernel series and smooth upgrades
> > > inside a stable kernel series are a must for many users.
> >
> > I don't necessarily agree that such changes in the userspace interface
> > should be tied to the kernel version number, really. That's a three or
> > four year warning period, which is unreasonably long. Six to twelve months
> > should be long enough for udev-based replacements to stabilise and
> > propagate out into distributions.
>
> Users have had the 6-12 month warning about devfs for a while now :)

No, they had a three year warning. "It'll be gone in 2.8".

> Ok, if people think that would really change anything, I'll wait a year.
> I'm patient :)

Delete 100 lines per week ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.185 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site