lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: New dev model (was [PATCH] delete devfs)
    Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> wrote:
    >
    > my personal opinon is that this new development model isn't a good
    > idea from the point of view of users:
    >
    > There's much worth in having a very stable kernel. Many people use for
    > different reasons self-compiled ftp.kernel.org kernels.

    Well. We'll see. 2.6 is becoming stabler, despite the fact that we're
    adding features.

    I wouldn't be averse to releasing a 2.6.20.1 which is purely stability
    fixes against 2.6.20 if there is demand for it. Anyone who really cares
    about stability of kernel.org kernels won't be deploying 2.6.20 within a
    few weeks of its release anyway, so by the time they doodle over to
    kernel.org they'll find 2.6.20.2 or whatever.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.027 / U:1.736 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site