lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: voluntary-preempt I0: sluggish feel

    * Rudo Thomas <rudo@matfyz.cz> wrote:

    > I would like to ask whether I should do this. Or is it just the other
    > way round - renicing the ksoftirqd thread "kills" the effect of
    > deferred processing?

    it is perfectly fine to renice ksoftirqd. Are you running xmms under RT
    priority? If yes then it will always preempt ksoftirqd.

    Ingo
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:4.323 / U:0.056 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site