[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS=n
    On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:50:12PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:

    > 1. let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL

    i don't like this change, despite what i might have claimed earlier :)

    the reason i say this is if XFS blows up with 4K stacks then it
    probably can with 8K stacks but it will be much harder, so it's not
    really fixing anything but just papering over the problem

    the reason for this is 8K stacks means you don't have separate irq
    stacks, so if and interrupt comes along at the right time and the
    codes paths are just right, you can still overflow (arguably you have
    less overall space than with 4K stacks and separate irq stacks)

    that said, separate irq stacks *and* 8k thread stacks would be safe,
    but i'd love to see ideas on how to get the stack utilization down
    (it's actually really hard)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:2.137 / U:0.388 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site