lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: preempt-timing-2.6.8-rc1
At Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:59:53 +0300, Lenar L?hmus wrote:
>> And this still seems to be very long and real:
>> 50ms non-preemptible critical section violated 2 ms preempt threshold
>> starting at snd_pcm_action_lock_irq+0x1b/0x1d0 [snd_pcm] and ending at
>> snd_pcm_action_lock_irq+0x65/0x1d0 [snd_pcm]
>> Trace has this:
>> [<f9239b09>] snd_pcm_playback_ioctl1+0x49/0x2f0 [snd_pcm]
>> So maybe this too is ioctl related (non-educated guess)?

On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:29:43PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> If it's SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_PREPARE, I'm modifying the relevant code with
> rwsem instead of rwlock. But it's still in BKL of ioctl. Do we need
> to unlock internally?

Yes, otherwise it'll be non-preemptible.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.284 / U:0.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site