lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: preempt-timing-2.6.8-rc1
    William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 05:28:05AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
    >
    >>>This patch uses the preemption counter increments and decrements to time
    >>>non-preemptible critical sections.
    >>>This is an instrumentation patch intended to help determine the causes of
    >>>scheduling latency related to long non-preemptible critical sections.
    >>>Changes from 2.6.7-based patch:
    >>>(1) fix unmap_vmas() check correctly this time
    >>>(2) add touch_preempt_timing() to cond_resched_lock()
    >>>(3) depend on preempt until it's worked out wtf goes wrong without it
    >
    >
    > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:36:00AM -0400, Joe Korty wrote:
    >
    >>You preemption-block hold times will improve *enormously* if you move all
    >>softirq processing down to the daemon (and possibly raise the daemon to
    >>one of the higher SCHED_RR priorities, to compensate for softirq processing
    >>no longer happening at interrupt level).
    >
    >
    > Plausible. Got a patch?
    >

    Make MAX_SOFTIRQ_RESTART 1?

    I don't think you should make ksoftirq a realtime task, because that
    defeats the purpose of having it to prevent livelocking userspace
    doesn't it?

    However, you may want to increase it from nice +19. Probably just to
    nice 0 would be an idea.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.021 / U:0.928 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site