Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: GCC 3.4 and broken inlining. | Date | Sun, 11 Jul 2004 15:01:18 +0200 |
| |
On Sonntag, 11. Juli 2004 13:50, Adrian Bunk wrote: > -#if __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1 && __GNUC_MINOR__ < 4 > +#if __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 1 > # define inline __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline)) > # define __inline__ __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline)) > # define __inline __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline))
While we're there, shouldn't this really be the following?
# define inline inline __attribute__((always_inline)) # define __inline__ __inline__ __attribute__((always_inline)) # define __inline __inline __attribute__((always_inline))
I find it somewhat annoying that the preprocessor expands every "inline" to "__inline__ __attribute__((always_inline)) __attribute__((always_inline))" in the current code.
Arnd <>< [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |