[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch

    * Andrew Morton <> wrote:

    > Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
    > >
    > > For all the
    > > other 200 might_sleep() points it doesnt matter much.
    > Sorry, but an additional 100 might_sleep()s is surely excessive for
    > debugging purposes, and unneeded for latency purposes: all these sites
    > are preemptible anyway.

    nono, i mean the existing ones. (it's 116 not 200) There's no plan to
    add another 100, you've seen all the ones we found to be necessary for

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.030 / U:13.996 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site