[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [announce] [patch] Voluntary Kernel Preemption Patch

* Andrew Morton <> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar <> wrote:
> >
> > For all the
> > other 200 might_sleep() points it doesnt matter much.
> Sorry, but an additional 100 might_sleep()s is surely excessive for
> debugging purposes, and unneeded for latency purposes: all these sites
> are preemptible anyway.

nono, i mean the existing ones. (it's 116 not 200) There's no plan to
add another 100, you've seen all the ones we found to be necessary for

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.117 / U:4.064 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site