[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [OT] Testing PROT_NONE and other protections, and a surprise
Kyle Moffett wrote:
> >The error code is -1, aka. MAP_FAILED.
> Oops! I guess I was just lucky that part didn't fail :-D On the
> other hand, it couldn't legally return 0 anyway, could it?

Yes it could -- if you request a mapping at address 0 with MAP_FIXED.
A few OSes won't do that, but Linux and many others will.

-- Jamie
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.094 / U:2.348 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site