Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:05:47 -0700 | From | William Lee Irwin III <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.X, NPTL, SCHED_FIFO and JACK |
| |
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 01:03:39PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > My impetus for doing a policy rewrite was the recurring complaint that > the 2.6 scheduler is currently too complicated for even basic > scheduling. I see no point in trying to implement other changes until > the framework for normal policies is in place that can be built on. I > don't see even the policy rewrites as being appropriate for 2.6, let > alone anything fancier. If we have something in place that more people > than not agree is satisfactory for normal scheduling, then more can be > added for 2.7+ development.
The point I had was really that what's going on is very minor.
-- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |