[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: A question about PROT_NONE on ARM and ARM26
Scott Wood wrote:
> > However, plain ldr and str instructions will access the page, but
> > get_user/put_user doesn't use them, and copy_from_user/copy_to_user
> > are carefully crafted to ensure that we hit the necessary permission
> > checks for each page it touches on the first access.
> What if CONFIG_PREEMPT is enabled, and you get preempted after that
> first access, and another thread unmaps the page before you're
> finished with it?

The code in uaccess.S:__arch_copy_{from,to}_user doesn't disable
pre-emption, and neither does its caller.

Pages can be unmapped just due to background paging. I.e. it's a
normal occurrence, it doesn't require anything contrived.

So I think you're right: that looks like a bug.

The ARM uaccess code was written before CONFIG_PREEMPT was added, and
this couldn't happen then. It could panic a kernel now. I wonder why
it hasn't been noticed. Maybe nobody turns on CONFIG_PREEMPT on ARM?

-- Jamie
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.083 / U:14.640 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site