[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [STACK] >3k call path in reiserfs
Dave Jones wrote:

>On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 11:04:49AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> > >>Can you give me some background on whether this is causing real problems
> > >>for real users?
> > >
> > >Especially with the 4k stack option enabled, it will cause real problems
> > >for real users. A better change would be to cut down on the size of the
> > >tree balance struct, but that would be more invasive. For starters we
> > >might be able to switch from ints to shorts for some of the arrays.
> > >
> > >-chris
> > >
> > Can you tell me about the "4k stack option"?
>Arjan's original patch & announcement are at
> Dave
Forcing kernel developers to distort their coding to keep stack sizes
small is not a good idea, as it makes the whole kernel harder to code
for a not very compelling (for 99% of users, please argue with me if you
think it is otherwise) benefit.

I do not think I favor disturbing V3's stability for the sake of the 4k
stack option, but my mind is still open.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.070 / U:9.780 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site