Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:20:47 +0200 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: Using getpid() often, another way? [was Re: clone() <-> getpid() bug in 2.6?] |
| |
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 08:09:17PM -0400, Russell Leighton wrote: > >a library using clone sounds suspect to me, I can't imagine an app using > >pthreads being able to just use your library as a result. > > > Why? In what way would a program that uses pthreads interfere with > threads created using clone()?
you do all kinds of tricks behind the threading library's back, and share some stuff while not others. I'd be suprised of that would NOT break. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |