Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:38:39 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: APM realy sucks on 2.6.x |
| |
Hi!
> My impression is that APM is slowly degenerating while ACPI is not > (yet ?) able to fill the gap. The suspend feature of ACPI is stated to > be dangerous and experimental and does not work for me at all.
That sounds about right.
> After all this bashing... > > Is there anyone out there who has the same experiences ? > > Is there a workaround ? > > Is it possible to somehow downgrade APM in the 2.6 kernel > to the 2.4.x state ? > > How could one debug this kind of missbehaviour ? Where do > I have to look for potential miss configurations of the system ? > > I'm really willing to help the APM developers to track down this bug > but don't have a clue how to debug this kind stuff.
What APM developers? There are none as far as I know.
Try removing calls to device_* in apm.c. Better yet become APM developer.
Pavel -- 934a471f20d6580d5aad759bf0d97ddc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |