lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: APM realy sucks on 2.6.x
Hi!

> My impression is that APM is slowly degenerating while ACPI is not
> (yet ?) able to fill the gap. The suspend feature of ACPI is stated to
> be dangerous and experimental and does not work for me at all.

That sounds about right.

> After all this bashing...
>
> Is there anyone out there who has the same experiences ?
>
> Is there a workaround ?
>
> Is it possible to somehow downgrade APM in the 2.6 kernel
> to the 2.4.x state ?
>
> How could one debug this kind of missbehaviour ? Where do
> I have to look for potential miss configurations of the system ?
>
> I'm really willing to help the APM developers to track down this bug
> but don't have a clue how to debug this kind stuff.

What APM developers? There are none as far as I know.

Try removing calls to device_* in apm.c. Better yet become APM
developer.

Pavel
--
934a471f20d6580d5aad759bf0d97ddc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.094 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site