Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:07:51 +1000 | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Staircase Scheduler v6.3 for 2.6.7-rc2 |
| |
Quoting Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>:
> Andrew Morton wrote: > > > At a guess I'd say either a) you're hitting some path in the kernel which > > is going for a giant and bogus romp through memory, trashing CPU caches or > > b) your workload really dislikes run-child-first-after-fork or c) the page > > allocator is serving up pages which your access pattern dislikes or d) > > something else. > > > > e) it's the staircase scheduler patch? >
Phy Prabab wrote: >Could anyone suggest a way to understand why the >difference between the 2.6 kernels and the 2.4 >kernels
I guess Phy better tell us if it's unique to staircase; and if so there's clearly a bug unique to it.
Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |