Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:08:35 +1000 | From | Con Kolivas <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Staircase Scheduler v6.3 for 2.6.7-rc2 |
| |
Quoting Phy Prabab <phyprabab@yahoo.com>:
> > Just to clarify, setting compute 1 implys interactive > 0?
Yes.
> > These numbers are very reproducable nad have done them > (in a continuous loop) for two hours.
Ok.
> > The test is a make of headers for a propritary exec. > Making headers is rather simple is all it does it link > a bunch of h files (traversing dirs) and some > dependance generation (3 files, yacc and lex). I have > moved the source code base to local disk to dicount > nfs issues (though the difference is neglibible and > nfs performance on 2.6 is generally faster than 2.4).
Out of curiosity, what happens from nfs? i/o effects can be significant. I assume you've excluded memory effects?
> I have tried to get a good test case that can be > submitted. Still trying.
Linking kernel headers with full debugging?
> Any suggestions to try to diagnose this?
Profiling.
> Thanks! > Phy
Cheers, Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |