Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Using getpid() often, another way? [was Re: clone() <-> getpid() bug in 2.6?] | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Date | Sun, 06 Jun 2004 17:58:11 +0200 |
| |
On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 17:38, Russell Leighton wrote: > I have a library that creates 2 threads using clone(). > [NOTE: I can't use pthreads for a variety of reasons, mostly due > to the wacky signal handling rules...it turns out that using clone() is > cleaner for me anyway.]
a library using clone sounds suspect to me, I can't imagine an app using pthreads being able to just use your library as a result. Note also that clone() is not a portable interface even within linux architectures.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |