![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 2004-06-06 at 10:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > And btw, if you'd have read the whole thread you'd have seen that I argued > against mergign the randomization and address space layout changes into > 2.6, and such changes during stable series are bad. But your still much > better of getting your code fixed properly, and thus pretty much means > havign your own binary format handler in the kernel that sets up the address > space in a windows compatible way. I find randomization interesting and worthy... I would like to see it integrated into 2.6 although adding a toggle to controli it use could be desirable. Another thing I miss is Process ID randomization ala OpenBSD. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||