lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 6 Jun 2004 01:40:25 -0700
FromPaul Jackson <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> or whatever someone can be arsed to consider a better idea.

If anyone lurking feels the urge to drive this puppy home, jump in.

I'm unavailable, and from what I can guess reading between William's
lines, he's not signed up either.  Be forewarned - it's an area that can
generate some long lkml threads ;).  Both William and I seem to have an
ample supply of keystrokes.


> a user ABI change in a stable series, would be unfriendly

I agree.  While I contemplated such, I don't recall advocating such,
for the reason you state.  We're stuck at least for now with the
sched_(set/get)affinity ABI.

-- 
                          I won't rest till it's the best ...
                          Programmer, Linux Scalability
                          Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2008