![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> or whatever someone can be arsed to consider a better idea.
If anyone lurking feels the urge to drive this puppy home, jump in.
I'm unavailable, and from what I can guess reading between William's
lines, he's not signed up either. Be forewarned - it's an area that can
generate some long lkml threads ;). Both William and I seem to have an
ample supply of keystrokes.
> a user ABI change in a stable series, would be unfriendly
I agree. While I contemplated such, I don't recall advocating such,
for the reason you state. We're stuck at least for now with the
sched_(set/get)affinity ABI.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||