[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use numa policy API for boot time policy


    > That's correct. It will only work for order 0 allocations.
    > But it sounds quite bogus anyways to move the complete hash tables
    > to another node anyways. It would probably be better to use vmalloc()
    > and a interleaving mapping for it. Then you would get the NUMA bandwidth
    > benefit even for accessing single tables.

    I posted some before and after numbers when we merged Manfreds patch,
    it would be interesting to see the same thing with your patch applied.

    Im not only worried about NUMA bandwidth but keeping the amount of
    memory left in all the nodes reasonably even. Allocating all the big
    hashes on node 0 will decrease that balance.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.018 / U:9.744 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site