[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation
Nick Piggin <> wrote:
> Yes, I'm all for the full cpumask abstraction.

Where do we stand wrt pass-by-reference? I remember there was initially
some concern that lugging 512-bit scalars around by value was expensive, so
Bill's original work was at least geared toward pass-by-reference?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean