[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation
    Nick Piggin <> wrote:
    > Yes, I'm all for the full cpumask abstraction.

    Where do we stand wrt pass-by-reference? I remember there was initially
    some concern that lugging 512-bit scalars around by value was expensive, so
    Bill's original work was at least geared toward pass-by-reference?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.019 / U:8.216 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site