![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > > Yes, I'm all for the full cpumask abstraction. Where do we stand wrt pass-by-reference? I remember there was initially some concern that lugging 512-bit scalars around by value was expensive, so Bill's original work was at least geared toward pass-by-reference? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||