![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004 22:18:54 -0700 Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> wrote: > The "ideal" solution, in my view, would be to have someone with arch > specific experience in each affected arch code these uses of cpus_addr() > out, then remove cpus_addr() entirely. > > Perhaps I should comment the cpus_addr() definition as 'deprecated'? I would suggest just making the build fail for these cases. You could do this by simply doing something like: #error Assumes cpumask_t is integral type at the suspect spots. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||