lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: per-process namespace?
From
Date
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 17:14, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > The per-process namespace concept comes in handy here except for the
> > static nature of the namespace. In the sense, any changes to the system
> > namespace do not reflect in the children namespace.
>
> Static?
>
> It's not static! It's private, as advertised.

> It sounds like you're asking (or your customer is asking) for
> copy-on-write namespaces :)
>
Yes! exactly right. A copy-on-write namespace. That way we dont even
have to invent new interfaces to define maskable mount-points that I
mentioned earlier.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.036 / U:0.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site