![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net> wrote: > > > Well bear in mind that we can then rip all the pt_regs passing out from > > everywhere, so as long as you edit every IRQ handler in the kernel it's a > > net win ;) > > Will you let me? :) USB and serio will at least not mess anyone else... There are only 1300 of them. Could do it in three hours. Don't tempt me ;) > > > > I _think_ it'll work - as long as all architectures go through a common > > dispatch function like do_IRQ(), which surely they do. The above code > > could be an arch-neutral inline actually. > > > > I'm not sure what's best really. But something this general is more > > attractive than something which is purely for sysrs-T. > > > > I don't like the requirement of SysRq request processing being in hard > interrupt handler - that excludes uinput-generated events and precludes > moving keyboard handling to a tasklet for example. Ho hum. May as well run with your original idea I guess. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||