lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 4 Jun 2004 22:20:04 +0900
FromAric Cyr <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] nForce2 C1halt fixup, again
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 05:12:51PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> If bit 0x10000000 is not set then C1 Halt Disconnect is disabled.
> I have reports that it is unsupported on some boards.
> 
> So what about patch below instead?

Thanks Bartlomiej.  I reversed my patch and have applied yours and am
testing it now.  If my system doesn't freeze at all today, I think
that this should be a sufficient (and necessary!) patch.

One thing that bothers me though is that 2.6.5 was unstable in the
same way as far as I can recall.  Since this fixup was not included,
do you think it could have been related to something else that was
fixed in 2.6.6?  Maybe IO-APIC or the "acpi_skip_timer_override"
bootparam maybe?

Thanks again!

-- 
Aric Cyr <acyr at alumni dot uwaterloo dot ca>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2008