lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromCon Kolivas <>
SubjectRe: why swap at all?
DateFri, 4 Jun 2004 00:27:57 +1000
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 00:18, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 07:38:41 +0200, FabF said:
> >>>Yes but: your wm is so often used/activated it will not get swaped
> >>> out. But if your mouse passes over mozilla and tries to focus it, then
> >>> you will feel the pain of a swapped-out x program.
> >>
> >>Exactly !
> >>Does autoregulated VM swap. patch could help here ?
> >
> > Con's auto-adjusting swappiness patch did in fact help that quite a bit,
> > especially for the case of heavy file I/O causing process images to be
> > swapped out. I need to do some comparisons of that to Nick's MM work...
>
> I haven't had a chance to try Con's stuff, the Nick patch is working
> VERY well for me, small memory and slow system, lots of memory pressure.
> Hopefully you can report a comparison.

Well note there are two revisions available now. The original linear design is
here:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7-rc2/patch-2.6.7-rc2-am11

and there is an exponential curve bias in this one which will probably
deprecate the last one:
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/2.6/2.6.7-rc2/patch-2.6.7-rc2-as

I am keen to get more feedback; apart from what I get off list there has been
very little in the way of reports.

Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2010