lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Staircase scheduler v7.4
Nick Piggin wrote:
> Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
>
>> I have tested 2.6.7-bk10 plus from_2.6.7_to_staircase_7.7 patch and,
>> while it's definitively better than previous versions, it still feels a
>> little jerky when moving windows in X11 wrt to -mm3. Renicing makes it a
>> little bit smoother, but not as much as -mm3 without renicing.
>>
>
> You know, if renicing X makes it smoother, then that is a good thing
> IMO. X needs large amounts of CPU and low latency in order to get
> good interactivity, which is something the scheduler shouldn't give
> to a process unless it is told to.

I agree. Although the X servers CPU usage is usually relatively low
(less than 5%) it does have periods when it can get quite high (greater
than 80%) for reasonably long periods. This makes it difficult to come
up with a set of rules for CPU allocation that makes sure the X server
gets what it needs (when it needs it) without running the risk of giving
other tasks with similar load patterns unnecessary and unintentional
preferential treatment.

However, I think that there is still a need for automatic boosts for
some tasks. For instance, programs such as xmms and other media
streamers are ones whose performance could worsen as a result of the X
server being reniced unless it is treated specially and the boost they
are given needs to be enough to put them before the X server in priority
order. But renicing X would enable a tightening of the rules that
govern the automatic dispensing of preferential treatment to tasks that
are perceived to be interactive which should be good for overall system
performance.

Peter
--
Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au

"Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious."
-- Ambrose Bierce

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:2.296 / U:1.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site