lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] kbuild updates
    On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:25:18AM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
    > On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 00:18, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
    > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:03:19AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
    > > > If I get just one good example I will go for the object directory, but
    > > > what I have seen so far is whining - no examples.
    > >
    > > Now I recall why I did not like the object directory.
    > > I will break all modules using the kbuild infrastructure!
    > >
    >
    > Below do not really explain this - care to be more detailed?
    >
    > > Why, because there is no way the to find the output directory except
    > > specifying both directories.
    > > One could do:
    > > make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/source O=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build M=`pwd`
    > >
    >
    > Huh? Explain to me how else you would do builds that have separate
    > output directory? And what is the difference from above to:
    >
    > make -C /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build O=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/object M=`pwd`

    Modules do not have O= specified.
    And you did not address the issue with modules makefile grepping in src.

    Sam
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.022 / U:1.240 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site