[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] explicitly mark recursion count
    On Wed, 2 June 2004 20:37:20 +0100, wrote:
    > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:58:32PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
    > > Note the "in the most general case" part. You can get things right if
    > > you make some assumptions and those assumptions are actually valid.
    > > In my case the assumptions are:
    > > 1. all relevant function pointers are stuffed into some struct and
    > Wrong. They are often passed as arguments to generic helpers, without
    > being ever put into any structures.

    Ok. Would it be ok to use the following then?

    b1. Function pointer are passed as arguments to functions and
    b2. those pointer are called directly from the function, they are
    passed to.

    Either that or the previous two rules, renamed to a1 and a2.

    (Note that I care more about sane rules than what any random code in
    some dark corner happens to do right now.)


    A surrounded army must be given a way out.
    -- Sun Tzu
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.023 / U:6.996 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site