![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
This was originally proposed by Rusty. I have it in two patches for a reason - rcu-no-arg changes the call_rcu() api and if it is too late in 2.6 to introduce it, we could still do some shrinking by applying the singly-linked-rcu patch. Other than the documented changes, there is no subtle semantics change - rcus are still invoked in the same order. Andrew, this will probably break manfred's patches, but 512-cpu scalability can probably wait a little until I get around to analyze those (my next task in hand) :) I have tested the patches lightly on an x86 box. Thanks Dipankar - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||