Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:01:09 -0700 | From | Chris Wright <> | Subject | Re: In-kernel Authentication Tokens (PAGs) |
| |
* Kyle Moffett (mrmacman_g4@mac.com) wrote: > On Jun 15, 2004, at 18:07, Chris Wright wrote: > > * Kyle Moffett (mrmacman_g4@mac.com) wrote: > >> One thing that I would very much like to have is the ability to create > >> a new > >> shell with a new keyring, such that I can still see and use the old > >> keyring, > >> but I can create new keys without modifying the old keyring, even to > >> the > >> extent of masking out keys in the old keyring without modifying them > >> for > >> other processes. From my brief glance at your patch, that's not a > >> feature you have implemented. > > Sounds like a CLONE_KEYRING flag? > > I think the two concepts are unrelated. You should not be required > to create a new thread/process/task in order to give yourself a
Just commenting on your desire to "create a new shell with a new keyring.." This had clone() implicit in it.
thanks, -chris -- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |