[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/5] kbuild: default kernel image
    On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 11:07:39PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
    > Better make life easier - but in a nice and structured way.

    Life /was/ easy when there was just zImage and Image on ARM. All you
    had to do was decide whether you wanted a compressed or uncompressed
    binary image of the kernel, where compressed images were the normal.

    And this is the way I'd preferred it to stay since we have a nice
    sane structured idea of what we provide without any major "what
    file format do I need" problems.

    The problem starts happening when boot loaders think they can dictate
    to the kernel what format they want the kernel to be in - at that
    point the number of kernel image formats and methods to boot the
    kernel increases and everything gets a lot more complex.

    This is the whole basis of my argument. We shouldn't make it easy
    for people to extend this stupid idea that the boot loader defines
    the format which the kernel shall be in. It's the _wrong_ idea.

    Russell King
    Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux -
    maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA -
    2.6 Serial core
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.020 / U:79.852 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site