Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Jun 2004 22:12:48 +0200 | From | Sam Ravnborg <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] kbuild |
| |
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:46:16PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > > Maybe Wolgang can jump in here - I do not know why mkimage is needed. > > But I do like to have it present for convinience. > > It is btw called mkuboot.sh in scripts/ to better say what it does. > > I'll let you read mkuboot.sh - you'll find that it's just a wrapper > script to moan if you use mkuboot.sh and you don't have mkimage > installed. > > I've no idea what mkimage actually does, but from the scant comments > in mkuboot.sh, it seems to package up into a "U-Boot image".
I know. I objected to the mkimage name in the past for a script in scripts/ for the same reasons as you outline.
Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |