[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: In-kernel Authentication Tokens (PAGs)
* Kyle Moffett ( wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2004, at 23:15, Chris Wright wrote:
> > Hrm. Wouldn't it be possible that two processes with same uid have
> > authenticated in different domains, and as such shouldn't be allowed to
> > touch each other's PAGs? Or is this not allowed?
> Linux doesn't really support the idea that a process should not be able
> to
> affect another process in the same UID. There's too many things that

Actually that's not the case. The UID is currently insufficient to
describe the security domain that a process is running in. The whole
of the LSM infrastructure is designed with this in mind. So somehting
like SELinux may enforce a security domain change (w/out a UID change)
across an execve() of pagsh. I was simply trying to ascertain if you
were storing this within task->user which I think would be wrong.

Linux Security Modules
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.068 / U:1.236 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site