[lkml]   [2004]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Permit inode & dentry hash tables to be allocated > MAX_ORDER size
>> Allocating the big-assed hashes out of bootmem seems much cleaner to me,
>> at least ...
> Machines big enough that such big hashes make sense are probably NUMA.
> And on NUMA systems you imho should rather use node interleaving vmalloc(),
> not a bit physical allocation on a specific node for these hashes.
> This will avoid memory controller hot spots and avoid the problem completely.
> Likely it will perform better too.

I thought Manfred already fixed all that up, didn't he?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.037 / U:2.084 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site