![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrew Morton wrote: > Eric Valette <eric.valette@free.fr> wrote: > >>The Changelog says nothing really important but forcing REGPARAM is >> rather important : it breaks any external module using object only code >> that calls a kernel function. > > > This is why we should remove the option - to reduce the number of ways in > which the kernel might have been built. Yes, there will be a bit of > transition pain while these people catch up. Yes, I think that should go into the 2.7 tree as soon as it opens. Of course it wouldn't go in the 2.6 tree, that's stable, right? -- bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> CTO TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:03 [W:0.402 / U:0.260 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||