![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hello Greg, On 05/05/04 19:53, Greg KH wrote: >>I think these things are unquestionable and don't make any functional >>changes to the code, so this should be applied to 2.6 now. > Now as in I'll add it to my i2c tree, which will get picked up by -mm > and let it bake a bit and then pushed to Linus, yes. This is how I meant it. Quoting your other mail: > Looks good, I've applied this to my trees, and it will show up in the > next -mm release. Ok, thanks. As my time permits it, I'll prepare patches to add class entries to the i2c adapters and i2c clients. But I won't be sad if the sensors people make the changes to their drivers themselves. ;-) (ie. mostly remove > if (!(adapter->class & I2C_CLASS_SMBUS)) > return 0; from the xxx_attach_adapter() funtion (the check will be done in the i2c-core and add a .class = I2C_CLASS_SMBUS to the xxx_driver static variable) > greg k-h CU Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||