![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 07:46:17AM +0100, viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk wrote: > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:44:33PM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote: > > Should I bother to polish this patch off and send it, or is it just not > > something we want to care about? > > No. This is simply wrong - one of the situations when you want lazy-umount > is getting a stuck filesystem (e.g. NFS mounted hard) and wanting to get > it out of the way, so that stuff it's mounted on could be unmounted clean. > > So we definitely don't want to keep anything pinned down. I'll buy that. I guess it's not worth dreaming up something else to make that be less surprising to apps with cwd in a lazy umounted mount. Cheers. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||