Messages in this thread | | | From | Rob Landley <> | Subject | Re: uspend to Disk - Kernel 2.6.4 vs. r50p | Date | Thu, 6 May 2004 11:22:48 -0500 |
| |
On Thursday 06 May 2004 10:43, Romano Giannetti wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 08:18:23PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > I'm one of the people for whom Patrick's suspend worked and yours didn't. > > Now I've been busy with other things for a couple months (Penguicon 2.0 > > went quite well, by the way), and there's talk of yanking Patrick's > > suspend code from the kernel. Right, so I've got to deal with this. I > > can't say I'm thrilled, but I DO want to continue to be able to suspend > > my laptop. > > Hi! > Just a couple of lines to tell you that I was convinced of the same (PM > works, SWSUSP-vanilla no). But from 2.6.3 --- to which I am stuck, had > no time to play, just to work, with my laptop till then --- swsusp > works quite well (modulo pcmcia modem sometime getting stuck after resume > and sometime no, misteries of life). Pavel told me that if PMDISK worked, > SWSUSP (vanilla) should work, too, and he was right (tm). > > The other way around is trying suspend2, given that Nigel is very > responsive; it will be the first thing I'll try again when having a > little time after IMTC04. It didn't work one month ago, but Nigel > thinks he have fixed it. > > By the way, I have a vaio FX701.
Thinkpad iSeries of some kind here. It didn't work in 2.6.5, but I'll give 2.6.6 a try and report back then...
The last one I _know_ worked was 2.6.2, but then I skipped 3 and 4. Too busy...
I'm happy to debug problems with stuff I actually use, modulo the whole "too busy" thing...
Rob
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |