lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: two lockups with 2.4.25
    On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 08:19:20AM -0700, Chris Stromsoe wrote:
    > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Oleg Drokin wrote:
    >
    > > Chris Stromsoe <cbs@cts.ucla.edu> wrote:
    > > CS> Pid: 26885, comm: sophie
    > > >>>EIP; c0110ed7 <flush_tlb_others+9b/bc> <=====
    > > >>>EDX; 01000000 Before first symbol
    > > >>>ESI; f4762cc0 <_end+343c85cc/3896e90c>
    > > >>>EDI; 081a1d28 Before first symbol
    > > >>>EBP; e806fe94 <_end+27cd57a0/3896e90c>
    > > CS> Trace; c011100f <flush_tlb_page+6f/7c>
    > > CS> Trace; c01259b7 <do_wp_page+223/284>
    > > CS> Trace; c01260de <handle_mm_fault+82/b8>
    > > CS> Trace; c01132f9 <do_page_fault+1a1/4ed>
    > > CS> Trace; c0113158 <do_page_fault+0/4ed>
    > > CS> Trace; c0224ce1 <__kfree_skb+129/134>
    > > CS> Trace; c01145e3 <schedule+45b/520>
    > > CS> Trace; c0106fc4 <error_code+34/3c>
    > >
    > > This backtrace is suspiciously similar to a backtrace from NMI WD I had
    > > not so long ago. Also on 2.5.25 Are your boxes SMP?
    >
    > The boxes are SMP (dual cpu p3 1400MHz).

    Oleg,

    AFAICS this backtrace is fine -- flush_tlb_others() does invplg and thats it. No
    locking involved, yes?

    I can see very interesting JFS traces in Chris's report. I'll answer his message.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.021 / U:0.500 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site