Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 3 May 2004 09:51:08 -0300 | | From | Marcelo Tosatti <> | | Subject | Re: two lockups with 2.4.25 |
| |
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 08:19:20AM -0700, Chris Stromsoe wrote: > On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Oleg Drokin wrote: > > > Chris Stromsoe <cbs@cts.ucla.edu> wrote: > > CS> Pid: 26885, comm: sophie > > >>>EIP; c0110ed7 <flush_tlb_others+9b/bc> <===== > > >>>EDX; 01000000 Before first symbol > > >>>ESI; f4762cc0 <_end+343c85cc/3896e90c> > > >>>EDI; 081a1d28 Before first symbol > > >>>EBP; e806fe94 <_end+27cd57a0/3896e90c> > > CS> Trace; c011100f <flush_tlb_page+6f/7c> > > CS> Trace; c01259b7 <do_wp_page+223/284> > > CS> Trace; c01260de <handle_mm_fault+82/b8> > > CS> Trace; c01132f9 <do_page_fault+1a1/4ed> > > CS> Trace; c0113158 <do_page_fault+0/4ed> > > CS> Trace; c0224ce1 <__kfree_skb+129/134> > > CS> Trace; c01145e3 <schedule+45b/520> > > CS> Trace; c0106fc4 <error_code+34/3c> > > > > This backtrace is suspiciously similar to a backtrace from NMI WD I had > > not so long ago. Also on 2.5.25 Are your boxes SMP? > > The boxes are SMP (dual cpu p3 1400MHz).
Oleg,
AFAICS this backtrace is fine -- flush_tlb_others() does invplg and thats it. No locking involved, yes?
I can see very interesting JFS traces in Chris's report. I'll answer his message. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |