lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 3 May 2004 13:09:48 +0300
FromMuli Ben-Yehuda <>
SubjectRe: 9/10 intermezzos prefer eating memory
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 11:37:19AM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Sun, 2 May 2004 10:22:26 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 10:00, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Im sure the 4kB stack brigade wont be too happy about this:
> > 
> > I thought intermezzo would have been rm -rf'd by now...
> 
> Should have.  I've written patches for intermezzo a year ago.
> Maintenance is a little slow these days. :)

Likewise. I have a patch[0] for intermezzo stack lossage from 2.5.73
era that hasn't been applied yet, AFAIK.  

[0] http://www.mulix.org/patches/intermezzo-stack-lossage-2.5.73.diff

Cheers, 
Muli 
-- 
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:02    [from the cache]
©2003-2008