lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 9/10 intermezzos prefer eating memory
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 11:37:19AM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Sun, 2 May 2004 10:22:26 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 10:00, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Im sure the 4kB stack brigade wont be too happy about this:
> >
> > I thought intermezzo would have been rm -rf'd by now...
>
> Should have. I've written patches for intermezzo a year ago.
> Maintenance is a little slow these days. :)

Likewise. I have a patch[0] for intermezzo stack lossage from 2.5.73
era that hasn't been applied yet, AFAIK.

[0] http://www.mulix.org/patches/intermezzo-stack-lossage-2.5.73.diff

Cheers,
Muli
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:0.150 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site