Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 May 2004 13:09:48 +0300 | From | Muli Ben-Yehuda <> | Subject | Re: 9/10 intermezzos prefer eating memory |
| |
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 11:37:19AM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote: > On Sun, 2 May 2004 10:22:26 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 10:00, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Im sure the 4kB stack brigade wont be too happy about this: > > > > I thought intermezzo would have been rm -rf'd by now... > > Should have. I've written patches for intermezzo a year ago. > Maintenance is a little slow these days. :)
Likewise. I have a patch[0] for intermezzo stack lossage from 2.5.73 era that hasn't been applied yet, AFAIK.
[0] http://www.mulix.org/patches/intermezzo-stack-lossage-2.5.73.diff
Cheers, Muli -- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |