[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Recommended compiler version
    Quote from Francois Romieu <>:
    > John Bradford <> :
    > [...]
    > > In my opinion, code that doesn't compile with 2.95.3 is broken - 2.95.3 is
    > If you are asking for technical details, please read the thread ending
    > at:
    > [...]
    > > Basically, 2.95.3 is something of a point of reference, so it only makes
    > > sense to throw it out once we have a new point of reference.
    > It makes no sense to religiously recommended 2.95.3 if it is known broken.

    The _code_ is broken if it doesn't compile with the recommended compiler, not
    the compiler itself.

    > If nobody comes with a better approach, I'll simply submit a patch to
    > remove the 2.95.3 recommendation (+ #error for the driver as suggested by ak).

    Please leave the recommendation unless it's being replaced by a new one.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.021 / U:0.100 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site